Krízový Manažment 2018, 17(2):66-70 | DOI: 10.26552/krm.C.2018.2.66-70

KRÍZOVÝ MANAŽMENT A ŠPECIFIKÁ V MANAŽMENTE ŽIVOTNÉHO PROSTREDIA

Nada ŽIVANOVIĆ1, Salih ŠUTKOVIĆ1, Aleksandra TORNJANSKI2
1 Faculty of Business and Law, University ''Union - Nikola Tesla'', Belgrade, Serbia
2 The College of Tourism Belgrade, Serbia

The survey data of business environment in environmental management confirm that required quality level of environmental performance has not been achieved to a sufficient extent, both here and worldwide. An important step in improving such a situation should be carried out by the management of environmental protection. To solve this significant global problem, efficient and high-quality tools, measures and techniques must be applied. The organizational activities related to environmentally healthy working and living environment include measurement of critical quality factors of the working environment. They also represent the main factors for the launch of improved performance in every organization. In practice, what is measured gets done and "if something cannot be measured, it cannot be improved ''. The paper shows an implementation idea of efficient ecological development in terms of organization management.

Kľúčové slová: Crisis management, Green management, weighting factors, quality

Uverejnené: September 30, 2018  Zobraziť citáciu

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ŽIVANOVIĆ, N., ŠUTKOVIĆ, S., & TORNJANSKI, A. (2018). KRÍZOVÝ MANAŽMENT A ŠPECIFIKÁ V MANAŽMENTE ŽIVOTNÉHO PROSTREDIA. Krízový Manažment, 17(2), 66-70. doi: 10.26552/krm.C.2018.2.66-70
Share...
Stiahnuť citáciu
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobraziť celý článok

    Referencie

    1. REGA, C., BALDIZZONE, G. (2015): Environmental Impact Assessment Review, V 30, Issue 1, Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A practitioners' perspective Original Research Article, pp. 105-115. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
    2. www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
    3. ZIVANOVIC, N., ZIVANOVIC, M. (2013): Business Process Reengineering, Faculty of Business and Industrial Management, Belgrade, pp. 64.
    4. ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for auditing quality management system and the system Environmental Management.
    5. https://ideas4sustainability.files.wordpress.com/2015/.
    6. CECILIA, H.M., WONG, W.-CH. (2015): Roles of social impact assessment practitioners, The University of Hong Kong, University of Melbourne, pp. 124-133. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
    7. The recycling and disposal of electrical and electronic waste in China-legislative and market responses Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 25, Issue 5, July 2005, pp. 459-471.
    8. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 30, Issue 1, January, 2010, Pages 19-27.
    9. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 28, Issue 7, October 2008, pp. 469-482.
    10. ISO 14004:2004, Systems of Environmental Management - General guidelines on principles, systems and support techniques, SZS, RS.

    Tento článok je publikovaný v režime otvoreného prístupu k vedeckým informáciam (Open Access), ktorý je distribuovaný pod licenciou Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), ktorá umožňuje distribúciu, reprodukciu a zmeny, ak sa pôvodna práca riadne ocitovaná. Distribúcia, reprodukcia alebo zmeny, ktoré nie sú v súlade s podmienkami tejto licencie, nie sú povolené.


    Späť na obsah