Krízový Manažment 2018, 17(2):66-70 | DOI: 10.26552/krm.C.2018.2.66-70

CRISIS MANAGEMENT AND SPECIFICS OF GREEN MANAGEMENT

Nada ŽIVANOVIĆ1, Salih ŠUTKOVIĆ1, Aleksandra TORNJANSKI2
1 Faculty of Business and Law, University ''Union - Nikola Tesla'', Belgrade, Serbia
2 The College of Tourism Belgrade, Serbia

The survey data of business environment in environmental management confirm that required quality level of environmental performance has not been achieved to a sufficient extent, both here and worldwide. An important step in improving such a situation should be carried out by the management of environmental protection. To solve this significant global problem, efficient and high-quality tools, measures and techniques must be applied. The organizational activities related to environmentally healthy working and living environment include measurement of critical quality factors of the working environment. They also represent the main factors for the launch of improved performance in every organization. In practice, what is measured gets done and "if something cannot be measured, it cannot be improved ''. The paper shows an implementation idea of efficient ecological development in terms of organization management.

Keywords: Crisis management, Green management, weighting factors, quality

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ŽIVANOVIĆ, N., ŠUTKOVIĆ, S., & TORNJANSKI, A. (2018). CRISIS MANAGEMENT AND SPECIFICS OF GREEN MANAGEMENT. Krízový Manažment17(2), 66-70. doi: 10.26552/krm.C.2018.2.66-70
Download citation

References

  1. REGA, C., BALDIZZONE, G. (2015): Environmental Impact Assessment Review, V 30, Issue 1, Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A practitioners' perspective Original Research Article, pp. 105-115. Go to original source...
  2. www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
  3. ZIVANOVIC, N., ZIVANOVIC, M. (2013): Business Process Reengineering, Faculty of Business and Industrial Management, Belgrade, pp. 64.
  4. ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for auditing quality management system and the system Environmental Management.
  5. https://ideas4sustainability.files.wordpress.com/2015/.
  6. CECILIA, H.M., WONG, W.-CH. (2015): Roles of social impact assessment practitioners, The University of Hong Kong, University of Melbourne, pp. 124-133. Go to original source...
  7. The recycling and disposal of electrical and electronic waste in China-legislative and market responses Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 25, Issue 5, July 2005, pp. 459-471.
  8. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 30, Issue 1, January, 2010, Pages 19-27.
  9. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 28, Issue 7, October 2008, pp. 469-482.
  10. ISO 14004:2004, Systems of Environmental Management - General guidelines on principles, systems and support techniques, SZS, RS.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.