Krízový Manažment 2021, 20(1):43-50 | DOI: 10.26552/krm.C.2021.1.43-50

ZDOKONAĽOVANIE METODIKY VYŠETROVANIA NEHÔD - EFEKTÍVNEJŠIA PREVENCIA A ZLEPŠENÁ KULTÚRA BEZPEČNOSTI

József LAKATOS1, Ágota DRÉGELYI-KISS2
1 Doctoral School on Safety and Security Sciences, Óbuda University Népszínház utca 8., 1081 Budapest, Hungary
2 Bánki Donát Faculty of Mechanical and Safety Engineering Népszínház utca 8., 1081 Budapest, Hungary

Investigation of major accidents, breakdowns and other unforeseen events involving hazardous substances is one of the most important tools for the efficient and effective development of safety management systems. This should be encountered in any management system operated by businesses, either as a specification of the used standard or as a description of various guidelines. These regulations apply to accidents, major accidents, and malfunctions involving the release of hazardous substances. However, they do not refer to the investigation of events outside a normal operation that do not involve the discharge of hazardous substances. It is, therefore, necessary to investigate incidents thoroughly and logically in order to prevent the occurrence of similar incidents and to provide lessons that will develop the further safety-conscious activities of employees.

Kľúčové slová: Incident investigation, Safety management system, Root cause analysis, Investigation of responsibilities, DMAIC model

Uverejnené: September 1, 2021  Zobraziť citáciu

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
LAKATOS, J., & DRÉGELYI-KISS, Á. (2021). ZDOKONAĽOVANIE METODIKY VYŠETROVANIA NEHÔD - EFEKTÍVNEJŠIA PREVENCIA A ZLEPŠENÁ KULTÚRA BEZPEČNOSTI. Krízový Manažment20(1), 43-50. doi: 10.26552/krm.C.2021.1.43-50
Stiahnuť citáciu

Referencie

  1. Behm, M. & Powell, D. (2014, Feb.). SH&E problem solving: Are higher-order controls ignored? Professional Safety, 59(2), 34-40
  2. Carpitella, S., Carpitella, F., Certa A., Benítez, J., Izquierdo, J. (2018) Managing Human Factors to Reduce Organisational Risk in Industry. Mathematical and Computational Applications 23 (4): 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23040067 Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  3. Címer, Zs., Katai-Urban, L., Vass, Gy. (2015) Evaluation of plant identification regulations related to hazardous plants - domestic regulations (in Hungarian), Vol(10) 64-77.
  4. Ferreira, J.E. & Lopes, I.S. (2010). Improvement of scrap request process with six sigma methodology. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering
  5. Granger, T. (2012). How six sigma can improve your safety performance. Incident Prevention
  6. Hosseinian, S. S., Torghabeh, Z. J. (2012) Major theories of construction accident causation models: A literature review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 4(2), 53.
  7. Jannadi, O. & Almishari, S. (2003). Risk assessment in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 129(5), 492-500 Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  8. Jazayeri, E., Dadi, G. B. (2017) Construction Safety Management Systems and Methods of Safety Performance Measurement: A Review. Journal of Safety Engineering 2017, 6(2): 15-28
  9. Karakhan, A. & Alsaffar, A. (2013). Measure and analyze the problems of concrete mixture production via six sigma DMAIC tools: Central Concrete mix plant as a case study. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 622-623, 472-477 Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  10. Karakhan, A., (2017) Six Sigma & Construction Safety: Using the DMAIC Cycle to Improve Incident Investigations Professional Safety 62(6):40-42
  11. Katai-Urban, L., Vass, Gy. (2014) HANDBOOK for the performance of basic tasks related to the safety management of hazardous plants (in Hungarian), NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF PUBLIC SERVICE, ISBN 978-615-5491-72-6, 6-10.
  12. Manuele, F. (2016, May). Root-causal factors: Uncovering the hows and whys of incidents. Professional Safety, 61(5), 48-52
  13. Mearns, K. (2017) Human Factors in the Chemical Process Industries. In Methods in Chemical Process Safety Vol. 1. 149-200 Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  14. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (2008) Guidance on Developing Safety Performance related to Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response
  15. Powell, M. (2013). Harness the full power of your incident-investigation process: Accelerate your incident-investigation capability and boost your safety-performance results by following these five steps. EHS Today
  16. Rancour, T. & McCracken, M. (2000, Oct.). Applying six sigma methods for breakthrough safety performance. Professional Safety, 45(10), 29-32
  17. Reer, B. (2008) Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission, Part 1: EOC identification. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 2008, 93, 1091-1104. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  18. Reer, B. (2008) Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission, Part 2: EOC quantification. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 2008, 93, 1105-1122. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  19. Rielander, Cheryl (2016) Safety Incident Investigation, Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd PO Box 14373, Lansdowne 7779, Cape Town, South Africa © 2016 Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd ISBN 978 1 4851 2110 7
  20. Serrat, O. (2009). The five-whys technique. Knowledge solution 30-33
  21. Vass, Gy., Halász, L. (2007) Assessment of the Land-use Planning Practices Applied in the Vicinity of EU Seveso Establishments, ACADEMIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN MILITARY SCIENCE 6:(1) pp. 77-88.

Tento článok je publikovaný v režime otvoreného prístupu k vedeckým informáciam (Open Access), ktorý je distribuovaný pod licenciou Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), ktorá umožňuje distribúciu, reprodukciu a zmeny, ak sa pôvodna práca riadne ocitovaná. Distribúcia, reprodukcia alebo zmeny, ktoré nie sú v súlade s podmienkami tejto licencie, nie sú povolené.