Krízový Manažment 2018, 17(1):29-33 | DOI: 10.26552/krm.C.2018.1.29-33
EXPERT JUDGMENT AS A TOOL FOR QUANTIFICATION OF PARAMETERS OF THE PROTECTION MODEL
- Katedra bezpečnostného manažmentu, Fakulta bezpečnostného inžinierstva, Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Univerzitná 8125/1, 010 26 Žilina
Property protection is becoming an increasingly important concern not only for companies but also for individuals. Its importance grows not only with increasing crime but also with increasing awareness of people about the protection of their property and property. This article focuses on one of the issues that we encounter in processes related to the achievement of the required level of property protection and professional judgment. Expert judgment has an irreplaceable position in the whole security process. It shows the cases in which this judgment has a meaningful significance and the principles to be followed in their use.
Keywords: property, expert judgment, uncertainty, methods, model
Published: March 30, 2018 Show citation
References
- Loveček, T., Reitšpís, J. 2011. Projektovanie a hodnotenie systémov ochrany objektov. Žilina: EDIS, vydavateľstvo ŽU. Žilina. 2011. ISBN 9788055404578.
- Loveček, T. 2007. Aktívne a pasívne prvky ochrany bezpečnostného systému. In: Krízový manažment. 2007. ISSN 1336 0019
- Veľas, A., Loveček, T. 2016. Analýza možností zvyšovania bezpečnosti občanov a ich majetku prostredníctvom preventívnych opatrení. In: Współczesność i perspektywy rozwoju badań nad bezpieczeństwiem: materiały międzynarodowych warsztatów naukowych. Zuberec. 2016. ISBN 978-83-61645-21-4.
- Lošonczi, P. Veľas, A., Kručanica, L. 2016. Aplikácia vhodných metód pri analýze rizík. In: Humanum : międzynarodowe studia społeczno-humanistyczne. 2016. ISSN 1898-8431.
- Kampová, K. 2015. Základné východiska kvantitatívneho modelovania rizika. In: Trilobit: odborný vědecký časopis. 2015. ISSN 1804-1795.
- Kampová, K. 2013. Expert judgement within the framework of risk assessment of industrial processes. In: Recent advances in industrial & manufacturing technologies. Athens, Greece. 2013. ISBN 978-1-61804-186-9.
- Kampová, K., Ristvej, J. 2013. Prístupy k vnímaniu rizika. In: Verejná správa a regionálny rozvoj : ekonómia a manažment. Bratislave.2013. ISSN 1337-2955.
- Lindley, D. 1994. Understanding Uncertainty. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
- Moricová, V. 2012. Vplyv záťažových situácií na krízových manažérov a ich zvládanie. In: Krízový manažment. 2012. ISSN 1336-0019.
- Hubbard, D. 2011. The Failure of Risk Management. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
- Morgan, M., & Henrion, M. 2007. Uncertainty. A Guide to dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Police Analysis. New York: Cambridege University Press.
- Hoerl, A., & Fallin, H. 1974. Reliability of Subjective Evalations in a High Incentive Situation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 227-230.
Go to original source... - Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1972. Subjective Probability. A Judgment of Representativeness, Cognitive Psychology, 430-454. Go to original source...
- Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.